First offered
by insurance providers over a hundred years ago in anticipation of the Halley’s
Comet return back in May 13, 1910, can insurance companies today be able to
“peddle” comet insurance?
By: Ringo
Bones
Unlike
meteorite strike insurance, which offers to compensate the policyholder against
the damage a meteorite impact’s kinetic energy may inflict on his or her
property or person, comet insurance – when first offered to the public over a
hundred years ago by insurance providers in anticipation of the May 13, 1910
return of Halley’s Comet – was, believe it or not, not for compensating
policyholders against a kinetic energy type devastation to one’s person and/or
property, but to protect one from what astronomers had previously found out
before about comets thru spectroscopic means. As Halley’s Comet came near
enough to Earth for spectroscopic analysis months before the May 13, 1910 return,
astronomers found out that the comet contains vast amounts of cyanogen – a
colorless, flammable and poisonous gas that is also present in simple and
complex cyanide compounds.
Experts at the
time believed that “comet insurance” might be handy to compensate the typical
policyholder in case the large amounts of cyanogen drifts into the Earth’s
atmosphere and cause widespread damage to crops and livestock. Strangely
enough, as opposed to what Walter and Luis Alvarez previously hypothesized
about a sizable meteorite or comet impacting the Earth releasing huge amounts
of kinetic energy that wiped out the dinosaurs a little over 65-million years
ago, comet insurance was created to compensate the widespread damage that the
large amounts of spectroscopically detected toxic cyanogen gas might cause
widespread cyanogen gas poisoning. And
yet, when May 13, 1910 arrived, Earth passed through Halley’s Comet’s tail
without any ill-effects. So is “comet
insurance” just something born out of our ignorance of comets?
Back around
1986, during the scheduled return of Halley’s Comet – given its 76-year orbital
period, Hollywood capitalized everyone’s fear and ignorance about comets by
releasing a movie titled Maximum Overdrive. A science fiction movie where every
mechanical contrivance started autonomously to kill humans after planet Earth
passed through a rogue comet’s tail. So, does anyone still think paying
premiums for comet insurance still make fiscal sense?
1 comment:
Are there any reliable actuarial figures justifying the establishment of a comet insurance with cyanogen gas poisoning coverage?
Post a Comment